crown casino deals
ruby slots mobiletty stupid, but your logic runs something like – “Your game had a minor and irrelevant error I didn’t know about, ignore that and what it says in the T&C’s I have agreed to, give me my money back. Is there a message there? As for the UKGC’s comments, the full correspondence has never been disclosed, but by any measure of regulators’ behaviour they appear to have acted partially and with undue, ill-considered haste in this matter, quickly and incorrectly treading in other jurisdictions’ affairs, effectively endorsing the findings of a non-authorised, non-approved ‘testing person’ instead of crown casino dealsraising their own queries; so they too are now aligned with the cheating side of this argument. Esteemed commentators suggest ‘her’ behaviour is not relevant (and that the error was deliberate).slotlady las vegas You say this is not relevant?The game was not ‘rigged’, ‘gaffed’ or any other acronym for ‘fixed’, nor was it even ‘advertised’ as having 100% RTP as she and many crown casino dealsof you have claimed. The first thread made clear that the game existed on Gibraltar, Alderney and Malta operators’ sites, I understand it also existed on others.I have been heavily criticised in the second thread for addressing katie91’s behaviour.online slots deutschland
caesars windsor best slots
free spins no deposit kenyaA number of CM users put katie91 and her so called evidence on a pedestal, built their arguments around her claims without checking them out properly, wanting to believe what she had written, and now they find it impossible to admit they were had over by a con-man and got this whole episode wrong.We have also had the self-righteous comments from the self-appointed ‘legal/compliance experts’ on the future of regulation, and what other regulators would have done etc etc.We have also had the self-righteous comments from the self-appointed ‘legal/compliance experts’ on the future of regulation, and what other regulators would have done etc etc.Did no-one else find it a little strange that an organisation that took 6 months to deal with the FOBT case (and provided virtually no information about it) and has zero profile in matters such as these, takes only 3 days to weigh in on this one, providing some considerable but irrelevant detail, promoting its own cause, despite the game meeting published UK standards (except for the error). You say this is not relevant?The game was not ‘rigged’, ‘gaffed’ or any other acronym for ‘fixed’, nor was it even ‘advertised’ as having 100% RTP as she and many crown casino dealsof you have claimed.I have been heavily criticised in the second thread for addressing katie91’s behaviour.free slot machines with bonus spins
australian casino no deposit bonus 2022
jeu gratuit double u casinoA number of CM users put katie91 and her so called evidence on a pedestal, built their arguments around her claims without checking them out properly, wanting to believe what she had written, and now they find it impossible to admit they were had over by a con-man and got this whole episode wrong. If katie91 had started the thread with,‘Hey I am a bot designer using false online identities and for the last 6 weeks I have been tryincrown casino dealsg to cheat a game, but I have goofed and I now realise there is an error on the paytable, but by the time I worked this out my bot had turned over nearly ￡400k and lost me over ￡12k, will you help me get my money back by saying the company are cheats?’Would she have got the same reaction? Is this accurate description of events not a bit more relevant that the 14 entries ‘she’ made to con you all? We are where we are because ‘she’ lied to you, end to end, and because I have taken the trouble to correct that situation, whereas other weighed in behind her without asking obvious questions. Is there a message there? As for the UKGC’s comments, the full correspondence has never been disclosed, but by any measure of regulators’ behaviour they appear to have acted partially and with undue, ill-considered haste in this matter, quickly and incorrectly treading in other jurisdictions’ affairs, effectively endorsing the findings of a non-authorised, non-approved ‘testing person’ instead of crown casino dealsraising their own queries; so they too are now aligned with the cheating side of this argument.free heart of vegas slots games If katie91 had started the thread with,‘Hey I am a bot designer using false online identities and for the last 6 weeks I have been tryincrown casino dealsg to cheat a game, but I have goofed and I now realise there is an error on the paytable, but by the time I worked this out my bot had turned over nearly ￡400k and lost me over ￡12k, will you help me get my money back by saying the company are cheats?’Would she have got the same reaction? Is this accurate description of events not a bit more relevant that the 14 entries ‘she’ made to con you all? We are where we are because ‘she’ lied to you, end to end, and because I have taken the trouble to correct that situation, whereas other weighed in behind her without asking obvious questions. For page after page, until we intervene, her lies that the game was ‘rigged’ are the basis of what we now say was a disproportionate and unfounded attack on the integrity of the games and the games provider, amplified by people who should have known better. Esteemed commentators suggest ‘her’ behaviour is not relevant (and that the error was deliberate).poker star casino app
blackjack dealer phrases
online pokies raging bull
cashman casino redeem codes
online casino games usa real money
watch keno live ga
free online slots jackpot party
fair go neosurf bonus 2022
1 online casino
bovada online casino no deposit bonus codes
habanero online casino games
online casino australia that accept paysafe
gold coast casino wifi
